Threat Hunting as a Service

Recurring reviewed hunts and evidence-backed outcomes without building a full hunt team.

Threat Foundry THaaS combines threat selection, ATT&CK-grounded hunt design, investigation, customer-safe publication, detection follow-through, and outcome reporting.

Service boundary

Scope, evidence, and conclusions remain visible.

THaaS is a governed hunting service, not autonomous response or an implied blanket monitoring service. Provider activity, frequency, targets, telemetry, escalation, and delivery follow the written customer scope.

Discuss the operating boundary
01

Select threats

Choose relevant behavior from reviewed intelligence, exposure, environment context, and coverage gaps.

02

Design hunts

Define the hypothesis, ATT&CK scope, telemetry, fields, limits, expected evidence, and false-positive considerations.

03

Execute within controls

Use only the agreed customer boundary and retain the exact query, assumptions, overrides, and provider-contact state.

04

Investigate evidence

Interpret entities, timelines, relationships, suspected activity, missing evidence, and analyst conclusions.

05

Deliver outcomes

Publish a customer-safe report and route reviewed findings into cases, detection requests, recommendations, or follow-through.

Customer outcome

Evidence that can move into the next decision.

The service retains the agreed scope, review state, ownership, limitations, and follow-through instead of ending at an isolated deliverable.

Customer-safe hunt reports

Approved findings, relevant evidence, limitations, analyst assessment, and recommended action.

Reusable hunt knowledge

Reviewed hypotheses, ATT&CK scope, telemetry needs, evidence expectations, and operating history.

Detection follow-through

Supported findings can become governed detection requests, cases, or remediation work without losing provenance.

Reviewed hunting outcomes

Make the conclusion as clear as the evidence.

The published report retains assessed scope, performed checks and telemetry limitations. Select one of four human-reviewed outcomes.

01

Malicious activity confirmed

02

Suspicious or inconclusive

03

No malicious activity observed

04

Insufficient telemetry

Performed checksReviewed assessmentExact previewPublished version
Publication and evidence boundaries

Zero returned rows alone do not establish a negative assessment. Planned work is separate from performed checks. The portal and supported PDF, Word and PowerPoint deliverables retain the same pinned publication facts.

Start with the workflow

Discuss a recurring threat hunting program for your team.

Bring priority threats, available telemetry, escalation expectations, and reporting needs. We will map a governed hunt cadence and delivery boundary.